Grading is one of the most hotly debated topics in education, and grading practices themselves are largely based on tradition, instinct, or personal history or philosophy. But to be effective, grading policies and practices must be based on trustworthy research evidence. Enter this book: a review of 100-plus years of grading research that presents the broadest and most comprehensive summary of research on grading and reporting available to date, with clear takeaways for learning and teaching. Edited by Thomas R. Guskey and Susan M. Brookhart, this indispensable guide features thoughtful, thorough dives into the research from a distinguished team of scholars, geared to a broad range of stakeholders, including teachers, school leaders, policymakers, and researchers. Each chapter addresses a different area of grading research and describes how the major findings in that area might be leveraged to improve grading policy and practice. Ultimately, Guskey and Brookhart identify four themes emerging from the research that can guide these efforts: - Start with clear learning goals, - Focus on the feedback function of grades, - Limit the number of grade categories, and - Provide multiple grades that reflect product, process, and progress criteria. By distilling the vast body of research evidence into meaningful, actionable findings and strategies, this book is the jump-start all stakeholders need to build a better understanding of what works—and where to go from here.
Bursuck, W., Polloway, E. A., Plante, L., Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., & McConeghy, J. (1996). Report card grading and adaptations: A national survey of classroom practices. Exceptional Children, 62, 301–318.
This book aims to provide a coherent and thoughtful framework for viewing the complex issues related to grading and reporting student learning.
. This must-have book will help teachers learn to implement improved, equity-focused grading for impact." —Zaretta Hammond, Author of Culturally Responsive Teaching & The Brain Crack open the grading conversation Here at last—and none ...
Agnew,E. (1993). Departmental grade quotas: Thesilent saboteur. Paper presented atthe annualmeeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, SanDiego, CA. Agnew, E.(1995). Rigorous grading does notraise standards: ...
... improvement has been made, rather than just where they are (Guskey, 1996b, 2006c; Guskey & Jung, 2006). As we showed in Chapter 4, most of the research evidence on progress criteria comes from studies of individualized instruction ...
This practical guide from a world-renowned expert on grading and assessment practices offers concrete strategies to turn parents and families into trusted partners in grading reform efforts.
orwin gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following reviewers: Jeanne Collins Superintendent Burlington School District Burlington, Vermont Kurtis Hewson Faculty Associate University of Lethbridge Alberta, Canada Frederick ...
Transforming Classroom Grading
The book also includes helpful samples of standards-based gradebooks, homework assignments, rubrics, and report cards.
Bursuck, W., Polloway, E. A., Plante, L., Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., & McConeghy, J. (1996). Report card grading and adaptations: A national survey of classroom practices. Exceptional Children, 62(2), 301–318.