Kant’s Dog provides fresh insight into Borges’s preoccupation with the contradiction of the time that passes and the identity that endures. By developing the implicit logic of the Borgesian archive, which is most often figured as the universal demand for and necessary impossibility of translation, Kant’s Dog is able to spell out Borges’s responses to the philosophical problems that most concerned him, those of the constitution of time, eternity, and identity; the determination of original and copy; the legitimacy of authority; experience; the nature of language and the possibility of a decision; and the name of God. Kant’s Dog offers original interpretations of several of Borges’s best known and most important stories and of the works of key figures in the history of philosophy, including Aristotle, Saint Paul, Maimonides, Hume, Locke, Kant, Heidegger, and Derrida. This study outlines Borges’s curious relationship to literature and philosophy and, through a reconsideration of the relation between necessity and accident, opens the question of the constitution of philosophy and literature. The afterword develops the logic of translation toward the secret at the heart of every culture in order to posit a Borgesian challenge to anthropology and cultural studies.
this a dog too? Kant's answer is that I can link this dog with other dogs by conjuring up a mental picture of a dog and checking it against the object which I now see. I know that my mental picture is of a dog because I have produced it ...
The Metaphysics of Fact Determination Robert J. Roecklein. nary opiner will tell you that he sees a horse. ... Allison denies that Kant relies upon any metaphysics in his critique of ordinary perception. Allison denies that there is any ...
Admittedly , however , the claim seems more problematical in the case of empirical concepts , such as that of a dog ( Kant's example ) . In fact , here Kant is frequently thought to collapse any meaningful distinction between concept ...
Seen from Kant's perspective, even an empirical concept such as 'dog' cannot be adequately explained in terms of the marks its contains. Wolffian general logic can clarify why the concept of a dog can be ranged under the concept of a ...
I could have done so more often if I'd had a book like this one as a supplementary text. ... I believe that most students will be able to make better sense of the Deduction if they read Chapter 5 (without necessarily reading the ...
Thomas C. Vinci ... Since the man does notexist, he is an intentional object, whom we shall call “intentional-Jones. ... into my field of view and my brain starts to be stimulated in the visually usual way by real-Jones.
A dog-thought then for Kant is not a linguistic term or a linguistic formula or an image or just a node in inferential patterns. Rather it is a real power to regulate (how to go about) perceiving. Finally, a thought is a formulable rule ...
Since we can recognize a three-legged dog as a dog, there is a minimal harmony of the faculties in this case. However, Allison wants to say that the case is not ideal, because a three-legged dog is idiosyncratic or atypical.
If I am right , Kant's basic idea in the third example of the schematism chapter is that the recognition of the dog as a dog takes place , not simply by looking at it , but by making a movement like the one just described , and , in ...
However , Kant argues that an intuition of a thing is possible only if it exists . No observation can be had of a dog in this room unless there is one in it to be observed . Yet for an intuition to be had of a thing it is not sufficient ...