This provocative study forges new and creative connections between Deleuzian philosophy and contemporary film studies.
By bringing together the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari with the theory and practices of anarchism, this book demonstrates that fabulating the future is nothing short of a noetic act, making reasonable something which initially was ...
This collection of 13 essays addresses and explores Deleuze and Guattari's relationship to the notion of anarchism: in the diverse ways that they conceived of and referred to it throughout their work, and also expands it in terms of the ...
Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989. . Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza [1968], trans. Martin Joughin. New York: Zone Books, 1990. . Foucault [1986], trans. Sean Hand.
In the guise of a playfully unorthodox lexicon, sociologist Daniel Colson presents an exploration of hidden affinities between the great philosophical heresies and "a thought too scandalous to take its place in the official edifice of ...
58 Berkman, What is Anarchism? (London: AK Press, 2003), p. 145. 59 H. Havel, “What's Anarchism?” (Stelton, NJ, 1932). 60 Ibid ; cf. Kropotkin, Selected Writings, p. 150. 61 S. Christie, My Granny Made Me An Anarchist (Oakland, ...
Review of From Bakunin to Lacan : AntiAuthoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power , by Saul Newman . Theory and Event 6 , no . ... Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press , 1986 . Mitchell , W. J. T. “ Representation .
Politically, this book provides readers with the means to better identify and analyze the diverse temporalities they encounter in everyday life, and better understand their experiences of them.
This book will serve as an introduction to Deleuze's politics and the contemporary vitality of Marx for students and will challenge scholars in the fields of social and political theory, sociology and cultural studies.
This is gray literature publishing: where intense thinking, change, and speculation take place in scholarship.
This is a timeless tale of the ludicrousness of power and its deluded defenders. In this fable, a child’s innocent questions meet the lies used to justify a world of cruelty and inequality. The result is quasi-absurdist, political comedy.