The concept of self-handicapping can be legitimately anchored in a vari ety of intellectual contexts, some old and some newer. As this volume reminds us, Alfred Adler was perhaps the first to articulate the signifi cance of various self-defeating claims and gestures for protecting the self concept. Thus the apparent paradox of "defeat" in the interests of "pro tection. " More recently (but still more than 30 years ago), Heider's "naive psychology" added attributional rhetoric to the description of self-defeat ing strategies. While predominantly cognitive in its thrust, the attribu tional approach incorporated several motivational influences-especially those involving egocentric concerns. Heider hardly violated our common sense when he suggested that people are inclined to attribute their performances in a self-serving manner: the good things I caused; the bad things were forced upon me. The notion of self-handicapping strategies, proposed by Berglas and myself a little more than a decade ago, capitalized on these homely truths while adding a particular proactive twist. We not only make ex cuses for our blunders; we plan our engagements and our situational choices so that self-protective excuses are unnecessary. In doing so, we use our attributional understanding to arrange things so that flawed and failing performances will not be interpreted in ways that threaten our self-esteem.
Also, Rita Z. Goldstein, et. al. “The Neurocircuitry of Impaired Insight in Drug Addiction,” Trends in Cognitive Science, http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364–6613(09)00146-6?ccs=y?ccs=y.
Basic Tenets and Constructs of Achievement Goal Frameworks Fundamental to AGT , as proffered especially by Nicholls ( 1984 , 1989 ) and Dweck ( 1986 , 1999 ) , are predictions concerning the adaptive and empowering features of an ...
Please check out more of our related titles at thePGI.org/global-press!This book's core argument is that even after taking into account the adverse circumstances and palpable consequences of educational inequality in this country, the ...
Self-Handicapping In their classic 1978 study, Berglas and Jones demonstrated that people who were worried about failing on a personally meaningful task sometimes chose to impair their performance by ingesting performance-debilitating ...
This is all you need to eliminate self-handicapping and unleash better performance - in teams, organizations, subordinates, and in yourself!
The book is unique in that it provides a balanced emphasis on social psychological theory and research.
Second , clients who explicitly or implicitly evidence a symp- tom or excuse in conjunction with a particular evaluative situation ( or situations ) may be uti- lizing self - handicapping . Again , the symp- tom manifestation along with ...
Zuckerman, Kieffer, and Knee (1998) provided a follow-up examination of the relation between chronic self-handicapping and academic performance. In two studies these researchers found that individual differences in self-handicapping as ...
The field has expanded since publication of The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, ed. by A. Manstead and M. Hewstone et al. (CH, Jan ′96, 33-2457), and this work is a valuable response to that. Summing Up: Recommended.
If so , what personality characteristics might characterize people who are prone to self - handicap ? 2. ... The use of self - handicapping can be reinforcing because it helps people avoid the self- relevant implications of failure .