In LexisNexis Practice Guide New Jersey Personal Injury Litigation, General Editor Barry A. Knopf has assembled a distinguished group of expert authors to provide in-depth procedural and substantive coverage of the causes of action central to New Jersey personal injury practice. Combining a task-based, procedural style with substantive analysis, and practical insight based on years of practice experience, LexisNexis Practice Guide New Jersey Personal Injury Litigation is a unique source for the attorney unfamiliar with the practice area, the associate in need of an authoritative source, or the solo or small law firm practitioner needing reliable guidance in managing a personal injury case from the initial interview through trial. Our distinguished authors and their areas of coverage include the following: Barry A. Knopf, Audra DePaolo; Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf • Medical Malpractice Anthony M. Carlino; McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter • Motor Vehicle Negligence William C. Carey; McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter • Premises Liability Nancy McDonald; McElroy Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter • Toxic Torts Diana C. Manning; Mark M. Tallmadge; Bressler, Amery & Ross • Product Liability Diana C. Manning; Bressler, Amery & Ross • Professional Liability Lawrence M. Simon; Law Offices of Lawrence M. Simon • Governmental Liability Each Practice Guide chapter combines authoritative legal analysis with expert authors' practical insights that have been distilled from years of practice experience. LexisNexis Practice Guide New Jersey Personal Injury Litigation includes more than 150 Practice Tips--Strategic Point, Warning, Timing, and Exception (with easy-to-recognize icons)--that transition smoothly from legal analysis to practical application of a point of law. LexisNexis Practice Guide New Jersey Personal Injury Litigation includes more than 100 forms references in checklists and in chapter text.
Distilling more than 50 years of combined experience from two distinguished New Jersey insurance law practitioners, this publication explains how to analyze, resolve or litigate the issues that can arise at every stage of an insurance ...
... within 120 days of the accident as required by the policy did not bar an uninsured claim, as the requirement of the policy was a dilution of the uninsured motorist statute and was therefore against public policy); Goldstein v.
That's because the authors of this practical guide have distilled volumes of information into a single publication.
Petitioner, ______[Name], Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, is a citizen of the State of New Jersey with offices at the Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, in the City of Trenton, County of Mercer, State of New Jersey. 2.
Arranging for Surety Bond for Guardian if Required by Court Both a general and limited guardian of the estate must post a bond, unless the court relieves the guardian of this requirement. NJS 3B:12-24.1(a), 3B:1224.1(b), 3B:15-1, ...
«Ch. 5», «Pt. XI» 1 LN Practice Guide: NJ Personal Injury Pt. XI: (2022) PART XI: ASSESSING GOVERNMENT IMMUNITY AND ... CHECKLIST: Assessing Government Immunity and Liability for Prison and Police-Related Injuries Determine whether ...
Com.; Schiavone Constr. Co. v., 98 N.J. 258, 486 A.2d 330 (1985). . . . 11.03; 11.06[3][a] Haelig v. Bound Brook, 105 N.J. Super. 7, 250 A.2d 788 (App. Div. 1969). . . . 10.03; 10.07[2] Hahnemann Univ. Hosp. v. Dudnick, 292 N.J. Super.
Shaw, 491 Fed.Appx. 353, 358 (3d Cir. 2012). After reviewing the text of the WCA and Pennsylvania precedent, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court “would find that the statutory text 'exclusive ...
2001) (citing Brewster v. Keystone Ins. Co., 238 N.J. Super. 580 (App. Div. 1990)). The requirement that a fee be awarded only to a successful claimant has been liberally construed to include claimants who settle before trial or ...
Authority: NJS 42:1A-4, 42:1A-24; Laplace v. Laplace, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6732 (3d Cir. Mar. 21, 2007); Gilbert & O'Callighan v. Anderson, 73 N.J. Eq. 253, 66 A. 296 (E. & A. 1907); Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.,