As the Battle of Waterloo reached its momentous climax, Napoleon's Imperial Guard marched towards the Duke of Wellington's thinning red line. The Imperial Guard had never tasted defeat and nothing, it seemed, could stop it smashing through the British ranks. But it was the Imperial Guard that was sent reeling back in disorder, its columns ravaged by the steady volleys of the British infantry. The credit for defeating the Imperial Guard went to the 1st Foot Guards, which was consequently honoured for its actions by being renamed the Grenadier Guards. The story did not stop there, however, as the 52nd Foot also contributed to the defeat of the Imperial Guard yet received no comparable recognition. The controversy of which corps deserved the credit for defeating the Imperial Guard has continued down the decades and has rightly become a highly contentious subject over which much ink has been spilled. But now, thanks to the uncovering of the previously unpublished journal of Charles Holman of the 52nd Foot, Gareth Glover is able to piece together the exact sequence of events in those final, fatal moments of the great battle. Along with numerous other first-hand accounts, Gareth Glover has been able to understand the most likely sequence of events, the reaction to these events immediately after the battle and how it was seen within the army in the days after the victory. Who did Wellington honour at the time? How did the Foot Guards gain much of the credit in London? Was there an establishment cover-up? Were the 52nd robbed of their glory? Do the recent much-publicised arguments stand up to impartial scrutiny? The Great Waterloo Controversy is the definitive answer to these questions and will finally end this centuries-old conundrum.
... 1812 and 1813 and from Belgium and France in the year 1815, Michael Anderson, Edinburgh, 1819 E. L. S. Horsburgh, Waterloo: A Narrative and a Criticism, Methuen, London, 1895 Henry Houssaye, 1815 Waterloo, Paris, 1903 François Hue, ...
Henry Clinton's letter to General Sir Thomas Graham dated 23 June 1815. Memoirs of Lieutenant Henry Dehnel 3rd Line Battalion KGL, in the author's Waterloo Archive volume V, p. 27. Letter of Private John Lewis of the 2nd Battalion 95th ...
Critical acclaim for Waterloo: New Perspectives The Great Battle Reappraised. "[T]he most important study of the Waterloo Campaign to have appeared in print for 150 years." —The Napoleonic Society of America.
10 of the 2nd volume, in the list of the officers present you put down Lt Colonel C. Hill as ADC to his brother, Lord Hill. I had the honour of being First ADC to his Lordship in that campaign, Lt Colonel Clement Hill4 being with his ...
Michael J. McCarthy’s Confederate Waterloo is the first fully researched and unbiased book-length account of this decisive Union victory and the aftermath fought in the courts and at the bar of public opinion. When Gen.
Anonymous, An Authentic Narrative of the Campaign of 1815 by a Staff Officer in the French Army (London, 1815). ... Bankes, G.N., The Autobiography of Sergeant William Lawrence, A Hero of the Peninsular and Waterloo Campaigns (London, ...
brother Joseph (nominally King of Spain) had been taken by surprise while dallying with a mistress, and almost shot by a British cavalryman. Joseph is a prime example of the unreliable links in Napoleon's chain of command who get blamed ...
This is one of the long-standing controversies that Andrew Field explores in fascinating detail.
Published to mark the 200th anniversary, The Battle of Waterloo Experience is a compelling new treatment of the Hundred Days campaign, beautifully illustrated and including reproductions of contemporary letters and documents that ...
Andrew Roberts presents an original, highly revisionist view of the relationship between the two greatest captains of their age.