Studies in American Tort Law is a careful mix of law, policy, ethics, and economics designed for first-year torts courses. Recognizing that torts is a prime battleground for social policy, this book reflects not only the current rules on injury compensation, but also the policy choices underlying those rules. The text moves from simple concepts and elementary rules to ones that are more complex or elusive. Within a clear doctrinal framework, a range of views is presented, reflecting dominant themes in tort law, such as fault, proportionality, deterrence, internalization of costs, and distribution of losses. These views are explored with special attention to issues at the cutting edge of twenty-first century tort litigation. The seventh edition reflects the highly dynamic nature of the torts field. The book includes new principal cases, scores of citations to recent opinions and statutes, and comprehensive references to the most recent volumes of the Restatement (Third) of Torts. There is a set of 392 PowerPoint slides availble upon adoption. Click here to view a sample presentation. If you are a professor using this book for a class, please contact Rachael Meier at [email protected] to request your slides.
... Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC80 at 193) doubted that 'there was anything to the advantage of the law's development in searching for a liability in tort where the parties are in a contractual relationship'.
This was established in Malone v Laskey (1907) and confirmed by the House of Lords in Hunter v Canary Wharf. Hunter v Canary Wharf [1996] 1 All ER 482 FACTS: A private nuisance action was brought against the developers of the Canary ...
Lord Pearson , Baker v Willoughby , at 496 I think a solution of the theoretical problem can be found in cases such as this by taking a comprehensive and unitary view of the damage caused by the original accident .
Rosenberg, 90 Md. App. 158, 600 A.2d 882 (1990), rev'd, 328 Md. 664, 616 A.2d 866 (1992) (see note 48, infra). See also Peroutka v. ... Sears, 163 Md. App. 220, 878 A.2d 628 (2005). 40 Compare former Md. Rule 342c 2(h) with Md. Rule ...
The book also incorporates comment on the implications of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the law of torts.
(Per Lord Upjohn in London Passenger Transport Board v Upson [1949] AC 155, 168.) Discuss the approach taken by the courts to determine when a tortious remedy will be permitted to redress a breach of a statutory duty when the statute ...
The authors designed this book on current education research.
Confirmed in Garner v Salford County Council [2013] where the claim failed for lack of evidence that the defendant's negligence exposed the claimant to more than minimal levels of asbestos. The opposite conclusion was reached, ...
Hardbound - New, hardbound print book.
Tort Law and Alternatives: Cases and Materials