Written by the law professors who have rejuvenated the field, Legislation & Statutory Interpretation is an authoritative & accessible introduction to the theory & practice of legislative practice, including lobbying, & statutory interpretation. It is essential reading for the student of these subjects as well as by the private practitioner, government servant, or law professor. Among its many noteworthy features are the following: The integration of the most important & current thinking in political theory, philosophy, & even economics with cutting-edge issues of American public law, such as the legitimacy of aggressive judicial review of popular initiatives & referenda, the constitutionality of term limits & regulation of money in politics, the ambit of legislative immunities from lawsuit, the utility & persuasiveness of Justice Scalia's hard-hitting textualist theory of interpretation, & the proper role of the celebrated yet much-criticized canons of statutory interpretation. The book is practically useful as well as theoretically sophisticated, as it includes a meaty description of campaign finance & lobbying regulations as well as the previously incomprehensible federal budget process, in-depth analysis of leading constitutional & statutory interpretation cases (including the cases most reproduced in casebooks on legislation & the political process), & an invaluable appendix of the canons of statutory construction followed by the Rehnquist Court.
See also Country Community Timberlake Village v. HMW Special Utility District of Harris, 438 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. Ct. App. 2014) (holding that a neighboring ...
After Justin Timberlake exposed Janet Jackson's pierced nipple on national television for 9/16ths of a second, the FCC received over 540,000 complaints.
Volume III: The Chesapeake and New England, 1660-1750 William E. Nelson ... Decision of Law, Surry County Ct. 1673/74, in Eliza Timberlake Davis ed., ...
E. Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941), 66 Edwards v. Housing Authority of City of ... Timberlake, 148 Ind. 38,46 N.E.339 (1897), 69,70 Graves v.
Fitzgerald, 4.08[B][2], 5.05[D] Fitzgerald v. ... Mastrapa-Font, 7.03[A][3] Fontaine, In re, 5.05[D] Fontenette v. ... Frost, 5.05[A] Formato v.
The sole remedy is avoidance, however; damages cannot be claimed under s. ... 17, it places a great deal of power in the hands of insurance companies to ...
Normally, a mate«s receipt would later be given up for a bill of lading, ... they necessarily prejudice the rights of those who deal in the goods ...
27 257 U.S. 184, 42 S. Ct. 72, 66 L. Ed. 189 (1921). ... 38 Argensinger, “Right to Strike”: Labor Organization and the New Deal in Baltimore, 78 MD . HIST .
704 Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, s. 80. 705 Leith v. Gould [1986] 1 NZLR 760. It is not clear how a New Zealand court would deal with a case such ...
... to meet the reasonable expectations of claimants about how the corporation should deal with them, by, inter alia, ... 7 Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975, s.