Our present system of criminal prosecution originated in England in the sixteenth century. Langbein traces its development, which was at its most intense during the reign of Queen Mary. He shows how the common law developed a system of official investigation and prosecution that incorporated the medieval institution of the jury trial. He places equal emphasis on the role of the justices of the peace as public prosecutors. The second half of the book compares the English system with those of the Holy Roman Empire (Germany) and France. He concludes by refuting the popular opinion that the English were strongly indebted to continental models. "This is an excellent work of scholarship, exhibiting wide research, erudition and analytical ability." --Joseph H. Smith, Harvard Law Review 88 (1974-1975) 485 JOHN LANGBEIN is Sterling Professor of Law and Legal History at Yale Law School. He has held academic positions at Stanford University, Oxford University, the Max-Planck-Institut fur Europaische Rechtsgeschichte and the Max-Planck-Institut fur Auslandisches und Internationales Strafrecht. Langbein is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the International Academy of Comparative Law, the International Association of Procedure Law, and other organizations in the fields of legal history and comparative law. Some of his most distinguished publications and articles include History of the Common Law: The Development of Anglo-American Legal Institutions (2009), Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancient Regime (1977), and "The Supreme Court Flunks Trusts," Supreme Court Review (1991)."
Code de procédure pénale annoté
For over two decades, Casenote Legal Briefs have helped hundreds of thousands of students prepare for classes and exams year after year with unparalleled results.
LexisNexis Practice Guide: Florida criminal practice and procedure
The Court upheld the legality of the search over defendant's objections : Since Rawls [ the cousin ) was a joint owner of the bag , he clearly had authority to consent to its search . The officers therefore found evidence against the ...
Hebrew and Mexican Procedural Law: Comparative Aspects
Gibson [1991] Crim LR 642 . . . 12.11 Feltham Justices, ex p. Rees [2001] 2 Cr App R (S) 1 . . . 21.16.1 Finley [1993] Crim LR 50 . . . Fig. 6.1 Flemming (1988) 86 Cr App R 32 . . . 6.6 Flynn [2008] 2 Cr App R 20 .
14.2.2 Drummond [ 2002 ] 2 Cr App R 352 ... 15.7.1 Duggan and Chohan [ 2006 ] 1 Cr App R 3 ... 19.7.4 Gibson ( 1887 ] LR 18 QBD ... 18.3 Gilmore [ 2005 ] 2 Cr App R 21 ... 19.7.1 , 19.7.5 Gleeson [ 2004 ] 1 Cr App R 29 .
El derecho internacional y el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos aplicados al juicio oral: el rompimiento de un paradigma
The Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong: 刑事訴訟程序條例(第221章). Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap 221)
15 Alan M. Dershowitz, The Best Defense xxi (1982) (stating that two rules of “the justice game” are: (1) “[a]lmost all criminal defendants are in fact guilty”; and (2) “[a]ll defense lawyers, prosecutors and judges understand and ...