Master spine surgeons Alexander R. Vaccaro, Richard G. Fessler, and a cadre of esteemed co-editors have compiled the most comprehensive textbook to date detailing minimally invasive spine (MIS) versus open spine surgery techniques. Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS versus OPEN: Best Evidence Recommendations features debates by renowned experts on one of the most provocative topics in spine surgery. Twenty-four chapters systematically organized into four sections -- degenerative, trauma, tumor, and other issues, cover procedures and underlying pathologies, backed by a large, diverse body of literature. MIS and open approaches are thoroughly compared and contrasted in each chapter. Evidence is presented and analyzed in an objective manner with 'opposing sides' presenting differing opinions and techniques, resulting in a synchronous collection of pros and cons. Every chapter is masterfully summed up by the book's editors -- each of whom have varying stances on the topics at hand. This unique 'duel' and 'duet' discussion enables readers to assimilate information, benefit from the balanced harmony between divergent opinions, and reach their own conclusions. Key Highlights Comparative risks, benefits, complications, and outcomes for a full spectrum of lumbar, thoracic and cervical procedures MIS versus open approaches for lumbar stenosis, synovial cysts, lumbar adjacent segment degeneration, degenerative scoliosis, flatback syndrome, thoracic disc herniation, and dural tears Tumor resection and stabilization, quality of life issues, and potential advantages and risks of MIS techniques Key differences in MIS versus open operations such as radiation exposure and costs Analysis of 3-D navigational imaging to improve outcomes and reduce radiation exposure and operating time This book is a tremendous, evidence-based tool to guide spine surgeons as they make important decisions on selecting the most optimal spine surgery techniques. It is a must-have resource for all resident and veteran orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons who specialize in treating patients with spine conditions.
Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12(6), 458–464. doi:10.1136/qhc.12.6.458 Bensinger, W., Schubert, M., Ang, ... Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(11), 1312–1324. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.023 Berkman, N. D., Lohr, K. N., Morgan, ...
... samples • four correlated samples Quantify association Pearson's correlation Spearman correlation Contingency coefficients between two variables Predict value from another Simple linear regression or Non-parametric regression Simple ...
Methods to synthesize qualitative evidence are now emerging and this text examines the methodological bases to qualitative synthesis and describes the processes involved in the conduct of a rigorous synthesis of qualitative evidence, with a ...
Translation Science and the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare
Clinical Wisdom and Evidence-based Healthcare
Evidence for practice has increasingly influenced and contributed to the improvement of care over the past few decades.
The Impact of Best Practice Information Sheets on Australian Registered Nurses: Impact Survey Report
Healthcare, health research, and improved health outcomes are of international interest and efforts to achieve better health for the global community have been high on the agenda for some years.
This book provides the framework needed to engage stakeholders in the translational research process in order to successfully knowledge into practice and policy
This is a teaching resource pack to assist clinicians, managers and educators in addressing the Clinical Governance agenda on enabling best practice.