The Advanced Torts casebook is designed for courses on the major tort law subjects that are not included in the basic first-year tort courses. The popularity and consistent use of this casebook reflect the fact that the book is unique in its in-depth coverage of advanced torts subjects, which are now the principal growth areas of tort law. Subjects covered in Advanced Torts include defamation, the rights of privacy and publicity, harm to family relationships, wrongful birth, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, interference with common law civil rights, liability for economic loss, interference with contracts, interference with business relations, unfair competition, common law rights to literary and commercial creations and ideas, trade secrets, and other economic torts including injurious falsehood. The fourth edition maintains the casebook¿s clear organization and rich range of cases from not only the United States, but also England, Canada, Australia and other common law legal systems¿cases selected as the most valuable for instructional purposes as well as for their influence in shaping tort law. New cases and notes, addressing such developing areas as liability for defamation in Internet communications, bring the material fully up-to-date. The casebook has ample material for courses and seminars on economic torts (business torts) or defamation and privacy (tort law and the communications media).
... Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC80 at 193) doubted that 'there was anything to the advantage of the law's development in searching for a liability in tort where the parties are in a contractual relationship'.
This was established in Malone v Laskey (1907) and confirmed by the House of Lords in Hunter v Canary Wharf. Hunter v Canary Wharf [1996] 1 All ER 482 FACTS: A private nuisance action was brought against the developers of the Canary ...
Lord Pearson , Baker v Willoughby , at 496 I think a solution of the theoretical problem can be found in cases such as this by taking a comprehensive and unitary view of the damage caused by the original accident .
Rosenberg, 90 Md. App. 158, 600 A.2d 882 (1990), rev'd, 328 Md. 664, 616 A.2d 866 (1992) (see note 48, infra). See also Peroutka v. ... Sears, 163 Md. App. 220, 878 A.2d 628 (2005). 40 Compare former Md. Rule 342c 2(h) with Md. Rule ...
The book also incorporates comment on the implications of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the law of torts.
(Per Lord Upjohn in London Passenger Transport Board v Upson [1949] AC 155, 168.) Discuss the approach taken by the courts to determine when a tortious remedy will be permitted to redress a breach of a statutory duty when the statute ...
The authors designed this book on current education research.
Confirmed in Garner v Salford County Council [2013] where the claim failed for lack of evidence that the defendant's negligence exposed the claimant to more than minimal levels of asbestos. The opposite conclusion was reached, ...
Hardbound - New, hardbound print book.
Tort Law and Alternatives: Cases and Materials