This phrase, heard countless times every day in American courtrooms across the country, sets forth the burden of proof placed upon the prosecution in a criminal trial. Yet this cherished principle is not mentioned in the Constitution, nor is it defined by any laws. What, then, does “beyond a reasonable doubt” really mean, and how should it be interpreted and applied? In Beyond a Reasonable Doubt more than 80 distinguished contributors reflect on what this standard really means and how it is applied. Brilliantly dissecting its meaning from every angle, attorneys, judges, novelists, journalists, religious leaders and convicted felons shine a light on the most compelling standard in our legal system.
Gaines: As officer in charge of the search, I was required to direct and control. I directed staff to the point of official recording and everything that was found was recorded. Temm: So your job apparently was todirect the searchbut ...
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
Selection of Larry King's interviews with leading lawyers, judges, jurors, and others on the issue of reasonable doubt in America's legal system.
Best Thriller and Mystery of the Year – Washington Post Best Thriller and Mystery of the Year – San Francisco Gate From the award-winning author of Quicksand, a gripping legal thriller that follows one woman’s conflicted efforts to ...
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
It tries to fly or crawl up the slippery walls – but lo and behold , this accident had the foresight to build a barricade . ... Three separate , awesome " accidents " indeed . INSECTS Until now , we have illustrated the incredible ...
Vaughan had carefully distinguished between the evidence of witnesses and the jury's verdict : " A Witness swears but to what he hath heard or seen , generally or more largely , to what hath fallen under his sense : But a Juryman swears ...
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: The Start of a Thrilling New Legal Series
This book describes the ways in which reasoning can be applied to OCD for effective treatment regimes.
In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of “reasonable doubt.” It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological ...