This book represents a practical guide to ethical decision-making tailored specifically to the needs of those who practice and study public relations. It traces the development of ethical theory from ancient Greece through the works of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle to modern day public relations executives including Harold Burson, Robert Dilenschneider, and Richard Edelman. The book helps readers build personal frameworks for ethical reasoning that will enable them not only to recognize the ethical issues at play in public relations practice but also to analyze the conflicting duties and loyalties in these situations. This volume fills a gap in the currently available books on the subject, most of which either lack theoretical grounding or practical application. Illustrative cases used in this book span a wide range of public relations functions. To update readers on issues discussed in this book, the authors have started an online conversation. Please join the discussion at http://Updates.PRethics.com.
"This is an intelligent book about serious issues in public relations: accountability, responsibility, transparency, loyalty, truthtelling, and fairness. It should be required reading in boardrooms, in PR classrooms, and at the Pentagon.
McDonald, Michael [accessed 2 October 2003] Ethics and Conflict of Interest. http://www.ethics.ubc.ca/mcdonald/conflict.html 2. Kernaghan, Kenneth and Langford, John (1990) The Responsible Public Servant, Institute for Research on ...
This thought-provoking book will be essential reading for students, academics and professionals with an interest in public relations, ethics and professionalism.
Figure 9.1 Avoiding conflicts of interest Notes 1. McDonald , Michael ( accessed 2 October 2003 ] Ethics and Conflict of Interest . http://www.ethics.ubc.ca/mcdonald/ conflict.html 2. Kernaghan , Kenneth and Langford , John ( 1990 ) The ...
In this rapidly changing communications environment, the long-term implications of social media are uncertain, and this book provides the much needed research to understand its impact on audiences and organizations.
This text highlights the delicate balance required to navigate the values and demands implicit to the field of public relations and those that underlie society as a whole.
In other words, saying, “In my opinion, Jane Smith is an embezzler,” does not make the statement an opinion.30 It can still be proved false. Two categories of statements are protected by the First Amendment opinion defense: • vague ...
Ethics in Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy is the first book to identify universal principles of responsible advocacy in public relations.
... actually responds to stimuli like that. When I see someone going down this path of fear mongering, I know right away their number one priority is not actually protecting people. It's not all sunshine and rainbows, but you need.
This is on the one hand due to the growing professionalization and institutionalization of PR, on the other hand stories of PR practitioners violating existing moral conceptions by deliberately lying to the public have been all over the ...