Evidence Simulations: Bridge to Practice

Evidence Simulations: Bridge to Practice
ISBN-10
1640200991
ISBN-13
9781640200999
Category
Evidence (Law)
Pages
125
Language
English
Published
2017-12-28
Publisher
West Academic Publishing
Authors
Edward J. Imwinkelried, Fred Galves, Thomas Leach

Description

This volume is designed to enable the professor to incorporate in-class simulation exercises in a podium Evidence course. Its eleven chapters take the students through each major area of Evidence law and give the students an opportunity to engage in pretrial evidentiary planning, arguments on evidentiary issues, and trial segments. All the exercises are based on two straightforward case files, one civil and one criminal. In some exercises, the students play the attorney roles. In other cases, the students view videotaped trial segments, pose objections, and make arguments either in favor of or in opposition to the objection. Each chapter begins with a set of "points to remember" to help the students develop basic trial advocacy skills at the same time they are enhancing their understanding of Evidence law. The Teacher's Manual describes in detail how the exercises can be integrated into a traditional podium course. For example, the manual includes suggestions for setting up the room, assigning roles, and providing the students with feedback. An alternative version of the volume contains expanded case files for use in a course in which Evidence and Trial Advocacy are taught simultaneously.

Similar books

  • Evidence Concentrate: Law Revision and Study Guide
    By Maureen Spencer, John Spencer

    R v Campbell (2007) FACTS: The defendant was charged with false imprisonment and assault against a woman with whom he had a sexual relationship. The prosecution was permitted to adduce evidence of recent crimes of violence against ...

  • Evidence
    By Andrew Choo

    An illustration of the application of section 74(1) may be found in R v Robertson. Robertson was charged with conspiring with Poole and Long to commit burglaries. Poole and Long pleaded guilty to relevant substantive counts of burglary, ...

  • Evidence: Cases, Commentary, and Problems
    By David Alan Sklansky, Andrea Roth

    He argued that Officer Moore was mistaking him for a man named David Bailey, with whom he was playing dice around the time of the sale. Mr. Copelin and his corroborating witnesses testified that they had seen Mr. Bailey repeatedly leave ...

  • An Analytical Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases
    By Ronald Jay Allen, Alex Stein, David S. Schwartz

    Hallmark features of An Analytical Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases: An opening transcript from an actual criminal law case illustrates how evidence is admitted and excluded in practice--Chapter Two on the trial process can ...

  • Texas Rules of Evidence Manual - Tenth Edition
    By David A. Schlueter, Jonathan D. Schlueter

    In Powell v. State,266 the accused was charged with indecency with a child. The prosecution introduced testimony from six witnesses to the effect that they too had been victims of the accused's acts, on the argument that the evidence of ...

  • The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence : Impeachment and Rehabilitation

    Lowery , 6.9 n.255 Turner v . Safley , 5.3 n.267 ; 6.2 n.262 6.12 nn.26 , 169 , 195 , 263 , 430 Tornay v . United States , 6.7 nn.77,96 Torres v . INS , 5.4 n.51 Torres v . Kuzniasz , 6.12 nn.272 , 276 Torres v .

  • Evidence: Text, Rules, Illustrations, and Problems : the Commentary Method
    By Michael H. Graham

    As the prosecution points out , Sullivan's direct testimony raised the issue of his credibility to the jury . Sullivan's credibility was in fact the central issue litigated in the case , as the defense presented only Sullivan and the ...

  • Maryland Evidence Handbook
    By Joseph F. Murphy, Erin Catherine Murphy

    Maryland Evidence Handbook

  • Maryland Evidence Handbook
    By Joseph F. Murphy, Erin Catherine Murphy

    Maryland Evidence Handbook

  • Evidence of Opinion and Expert Evidence
    By Great Britain. Law Reform Committee, Stationery Office, The

    Evidence of Opinion and Expert Evidence