Historically, the reliability growth process has been thought of, and treated as, a reactive approach to growing reliability based on failures "discovered" during testing or, most unfortunately, once a system/product has been delivered to a customer. As a result, many reliability growth models are predicated on starting the reliability growth process at test time "zero", with some initial level of reliability (usually in the context of a time-based measure such as Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)). Time "zero" represents the start of testing, and the initial reliability of the test item is based on its inherent design. The problem with this approach, still predominant today, is that it ignores opportunities to grow reliability during the design of a system or product, i.e., opportunities to go into reliability growth testing with a higher initial inherent reliability at time zero. In addition to the traditional approaches to reliability growth during test, this book explores the activities and opportunities that can be leveraged to promote and achieve reliability growth during the design phase of the overall system life cycle. The ability to do so as part of an integrated, proactive design environment has significant implications for developing and delivering reliable items quickly, on time and within budget. This book offers new definitions of how failures can be characterized, and how those new definitions can be used to develop metrics that will quantify how effective a Design for Reliability (DFR) process is in (1) identifying failure modes and (2) mitigating their root failure causes. Reliability growth can only occur in the presence of both elements.
... [3.64] [3.65] [3.66] [3.67] Pecht M.G. et al., Guidebook for Managing Silicon Chip Reliability, 1999, CRC Press, NY; et al, Influence of Temperature on Microelectronics and System Reliability: A PoF Approach, 2006, Lavoisier, Paris.
Bernd Bertsche, Reliability in Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, Springer (2008), Chap. 3 David Nicholls, Paul Lein, Thomas McGibbon, Achieving System Reliability Growth Through Robust Design and Test, Quanterion Solutions ...
Allocation of reliability goals to lower-tier elements allows each part of the design team to target a specific reliability goal for ... the reliability growth testing, which will be needed to achieve the allocated software reliability.
A high percentage of defense systems fail to meet their reliability requirements. This is a serious problem for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), as well as the nation.
Diethelm, Pascal, and Martin McKee. “Lifting the Smokescreen: Tobacco Industry Strategy to Defeat Smoke Free ... Evans, Merran, Nicholas Hastings, and Brian Peacock. Statistical Distributions, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1993.
The "System Reliability Toolkit" represents a distinct departure from previous editions of the RIAC Toolkit series. It represents our first major collaboration with a sister IAC, the Data and Analysis...
Special features of this book include: A unified approach that integrates ideas from computer science and reliability engineering Techniques applicable to reliability as well as safety, maintainability, system integration, and logistic ...
To achieve all of these goals requires applying concerted R&QA (Reliability and Quality Assurance) efforts ... for achieving high reliability and availability is that the design shall be proven to be robust (achieved by applying the ...
Acquisition of Major Weapons Systems by the Department of Defense and S. 454, the Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act of...
This is achieved by integrating highly accelerated life test (HALT) and highly accelerated stress screen (HASS) into a physics of failure based robust product and process development methodology.