"Impeachment is rare, and for good reason. Designed to check tyrants or defend the nation from a commander-in-chief who refuses to do so, the process of impeachment outlined in the Constitution is what Thomas Jefferson called "the most formidable weapon for the purpose of a dominant faction that was ever contrived." It nullifies the will of voters, the basic foundation of legitimacy for all representative democracies. Only three times has a president's conduct led to such political disarray as to warrant his potential removal from office, transforming a political crisis into a constitutional one. None has yet succeeded. In the first book to consider these three presidents alone, and the one thing they have in common, Jeffrey Engel, Jon Meacham, Timothy Naftali, and Peter Baker explain that the basis and process of impeachment is more political than it is a legal verdict. The Constitution states that the president, "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," leaving room for historical precedent and the temperament of the time to weigh heavily on each case. These three cases highlight factors beyond the president's behavior that impact the likelihood and outcome of an impeachment: the president's relationship with Congress, the power and resilience of the office itself, and the polarization of the moment. This is a realist, rather than hypothetical, view of impeachment that looks to history for clues about its future--with one obvious candidate in mind"--
As Congress prepares articles of impeachment of President Trump, read the definitive book on presidential impeachment and how it should be used today.
In an alternate history novel, Lincoln escapes assassination by John Wilkes Booth only to face impeachment, and Abigail Canner, a young black woman involved in his defense, helps investigate the murder of the president's counsel.
18. counting to SeVen Page 219 [I]t is certain that no man: lady trevelyan, ed., The Works of Lord Macaulay, new York: longmans, green & co. (1897), pp. 634–35. 219 It was all conjecture: Moore diary/large diary, april 19, 1868, p. 14.
In 1936, the House impeached and the Senate convicted and removed Halsted Ritter from a federal district judgeship because he had engaged in a series of inappropriate transactions with litigants that degraded the judiciary.77 The fact ...
The impeachment process is one of the most serious government proceedings in the United States. This guide dispels the most common myths about the process while setting forth a definition of what it means for a president to be impeached.
49 This conclusion is supported in part by the fact that of the seven charges made against ritter, the senate was unable to muster a guilty verdict on any of the six specific counts and convicted ritter only on the final count, ...
While it is commonly known that Andrew Johnson was the first president to be impeached, less well known are the circumstances that led to the unsuccessful campaign to remove him from office.
The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office Dave Lindorff, Barbara Olshansky ... stories were just beginning to come out linking Republican megalobbyist Jack Abramoff to the White House and to President Bush.
A non-partisan guide to a precise understanding of the rules and history of impeachment .
Photographs illustrate key moments and ideas, while fact boxes offer fast facts on essential topics. Highly informative and accessible, this book will be an important addition to any library or classroom.