The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.
... sa langue');68 A.Fr.Av refers to the use of English in France as 'the fire that is devastating our language and with ... Tenir sa langue pour ne pas être réduit au silence” 〈http://www.courriellanguefrancaise.org/pdf/Article G. Gastaud ...
The topic of linguistic purism in its many realisations is the subject of this volume of 19 articles selected from the contributions presented at a conference at the University of Bristol in 2003.
This book contributes to a growing literature on language ideology, and will be of interest to anthropologists, political scientists and linguists interested in the practical and theoretical dimensions of language contact, minority language ...
... Languages ( co - edited with Winifred Davies ) , and Linguistic Purism in Action - How Auxiliary Tun was Stigmatized in Early New High German . Teresa Marqués - Aguado ( B.A. and Ph.D. Málaga ) is a Lecturer at the University of Murcia ...
... Language Semantics 6 : 57–123 . Langer , Nils . 2001. Linguistic purism in action . How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German . Berlin : de Gruyter . Lasnik , Howard ; and Sobin , Nicholas . 2000. " The WHO / WHOM ...
More recently, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, a Third Generation of sociolinguists have stressed the individuality of speakers by making use of a constructivist approach based on speaker's agency (individual action), ...
SG Da ist der Mann, den ich sehen will, UR Dert isch dř Màn, wu n ich*sahna will Gilbert (1972): 27 Roesch (2009) 27 vo (colloq.): 4, 6, 7, 8, 9,13,14, 17, 18, 19, 20,21, 22, 24, 25, 27 16 v~ (UR): 202, 233, 234, 235, 236, ...
... Linguistic Change . Social Factors . Oxford : Blackwell . Langer , Nils . 2001. Linguistic Purism in Action : How Auxiliary tun Was Stigmatized in Early New High German . Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter . Lass , Roger . 1991. ' Of Data and ...
(2014) have formulated the Final-Over-Final (fofc) constraint (6), which is a universal constraint on phrase-structure configurations (7): (6) The Final-over-Final Condition (fofc): A head-final phrase αP cannot dominate a head-initial ...
Language, Nation and Power provides students with a discussion of the ways in which language has been (and is being) used to construct national (or ethnic) identity.