"... to be consulted before any significant legal debate." W. J. Stewart in: Scots Law Times 1995This volume is concerned with the history of the concept of, or of the remedies for, unjust enrichment in the Civil law and the Common law. But this history is radically different in the two systems - different both in the starting point of each system and in the methods by which progress from that starting point was made.What for the Civil law is the starting point is for the Common law the ultimate outcome. The Civil law from its earliest medieval beginnings had before its eyes, at least as a potential unifying principle, the concept of unjust enrichment which it found in the Corpus Iuris, whereas it is only very recently (and outside the chronological scope of this volume) that the Common law has come to accept such a principle.The methods by which the Civil lawyers progressed from their starting point towards the well articulated concepts of the modern law were those of the interpreter and elaborator of texts which had their own unquestioned authority. And their discussions, which were those of the scholar and the school-room, are well documented.For the Common lawyers, on the other hand, the starting point was nothing but the practice of the courts and their methods were those appropriate to that practice. The plaintiff's remedy in a particular case was everything. Moreover, since the practice of the courts until very recent times is very imperfectly evidenced, the course of the development of the Common law is often difficult to trace. The researches contained in this volume show that it is only with benefit of hindsight, and then only to very limited extent, that one can see that development as leading to the recent acceptance of a doctrine of unjust enrichment.
... Reginald 184 McKibbin , R. 65 , 217 , 247 , 272 , 273 , 284 Mackintosh , Alphonso 162 Macmillan , Harold 298-9 mains ( dicing game ) 21 managers 200-5 , 400 Masterman , C. E. G. 183 match betting 218 Matthews , Charles 180 Matthews ...
Mark A. Graber, Howard Gillman ... 2 In an introduction to a work subtitled Lessons from the Confederate Constitution that rarely refers to slaves or slavery, Marshall L. DeRosa declares, “the model of government embodied in the CSA ...
12. 1807 Yours of the 3d . Int has been duly received . " The opinions which you give touching the case of Lee & Coulson have been always mine , ever since I examined the case . I now enclose you a Copy of Murdocks deposition .
196. Id. at 813-16 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (citing Romero v. Int'l Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354 (1959); Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 (1953); Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch64)(l804)). 197. Id. at 8 1 7.
页末的这幅图片描绘了一个断头台的早期原型,名为“福尔布雷特”(字面意思是“下落的木板”)。在这个刑具中,没有锋利的(甚或金属的)刀片,通过迅速一击来使身首分离;相反,这个刑具只是由几块结实的橡木板构成。在锤击的作用下,厚钝的木板边缘可以砸烂受害者的 ...
1962年9月,美国司法部长罗伯特•肯尼迪主持召开“毒品滥用白宫会议”,开始从公众健康导向角度思考吸毒问题,尝试进行毒品贩卖者和毒品成瘾者之间的区分。1965年3月8日,约翰逊总统批准了《1965年药品滥用管制修正案》,对危险药品的非法使用进行严格管制, ...
Trial of the Chicago Eight (or Chicago Seven).
Papers of John Marshall: Vol. II: Correspondence and Papers, July 1788-December 1795, and Account Book, July 1788-December 1795
In its determination to preserve the century of revolution, Gale initiated a revolution of its own: digitization of epic proportions to preserve these invaluable works in the largest archive of its kind.
本书对古典私权一般理论的发展历程进行深入考察,包括考察其思想根源——盛行于17世纪末期至18世纪的德国自然权利义务理论;探究其对民法体系构造的影响,借此揭示潘得克吞式民法体系的形成原因与内在机理。