The ‘International Military Tribunal for the Far East’ (IMTFE), held in Tokyo from May 1946 to November 1948, was a landmark event in the development of modern international criminal law. The trial in Tokyo was a complex undertaking and international effort to hold individuals accountable for core international crimes and delivering justice. The Tribunal consisted of 11 judges and respective national prosecution teams from 11 countries, and a mixed Japanese–American team of defence lawyers. The IMTFE indicted 28 Japanese defendants, amongst them former prime ministers, cabinet ministers, military leaders, and diplomats, based on a 55-count indictment pertaining to crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The judgment was not unanimous, with one majority judgment, two concurring opinions, and three dissenting opinions. The trial and the outcome were the subject of significant controversy and the Tribunal’s files were subsequently shelved in the archives. While its counterpart in Europe, the ‘International Military Tribunal’ (IMT) at Nuremberg, has been at the centre of public and scholarly interest, the Tokyo Tribunal has more recently gained international scholarly attention. This volume combines perspectives from law, history, and the social sciences to discuss the legal, historical, political and cultural significance of the Tokyo Tribunal. The collection is based on an international conference marking the 70th anniversary of the judgment of the IMTFE, which was held in Nuremberg in 2018. The volume features reflections by eminent scholars and experts on the establishment and functioning of the Tribunal, procedural and substantive issues as well as receptions and repercussions of the trial.
Challenges the persistent orthodoxies of the Tokyo tribunal and provides a new framework for evaluating the trial, revealing its importance to international jurisprudence.
The aim of this new collection of essays is to engage in analysis beyond the familiar victor’s justice critiques.
Historical War Crimes Trials in Asia
Provides an analysis of the process by which the Nanjing Massacre has become an international symbol, traces evolving and conflicting interpretations, and examines how changing social and political environments have influenced the debate.
A narrative account of the Doolittle Raids of World War II traces the daring Raiders attack on mainland Japan, the fate of the crews who survived the mission, and the international war crimes trials that defined Japanese-American relations ...
The Tokyo Tribunal: Perspectives on Law, History and Memory (Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher 2020) 31; Kerstin von Lingen, 'The Tokyo Tribunal: A Transcultural Endeavour' ibid 61. 8 See also Phani Dascalopoulo-Livada, ...
35 More recently , the same deterioration of shared memory has occurred regarding the " Battle of the Alamo , " the 1836 siege of ... The City of Collective that in premodern societies authoritative stories about the past often Part I. 21.
Due to their symbolic and iconographic meanings, expressions of ‘collective memory’ constitute the mental topography of a society and make a powerful contribution to its cultural, political and social identity.
Taking an interdisciplinary approach, this book raises new questions and provides different perspectives on the roles, responsibilities, ethics and protection of interpreters in war while investigating the substance and agents of Japanese ...
This book intervenes critically in the fields of international criminal law and international legal history by bringing in new voices and fresh approaches.