Current Legal Issues, like its sister volume Current Legal Problems, is based upon an annual colloquium held at Univesity College London. Each year leading scholars from around the world gather to discuss the relationship between law and another discipline of thought. Each colloquium examines how the external discipline is conceived in legal thought and argument, how the law is pictured in that discipline, and analyses points of controversy in the use, and abuse, of extra-legal arguments within legal theory and practice. Law and Neuroscience, the latest volume in the Current Legal Issues series, offers an insight into the state of law and nueroscience scholarship today. Focussing on the inter-connections between the two disciplines, it addresses the key issues informing current debates.
Roskies , Adina L. , “Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance, ” 1 Neuroethics 19 ( 2008 ). Rubinstein , Ariel , “Comment on Neuroeconomics, ” 24 Econ. & Phil . 485 ( 2008 ). Ryle , Gilbert , The Concept of ...
Although there was a substantial range of opinion among Project participants about the potential relevance of neuroscience to criminal law, it became apparent that a basic primer or handbook that set forth a statement of the relation as the ...
This book studies the various interactions between neuroscience and the world of law, and explores how neuroscientific findings could affect some fundamental legal categories and how the law should be implemented in such cases.
Bringing together the latest work from leading scholars in this emerging and vibrant subfield of law, this book examines the philosophical issues that inform the intersection between law and neuroscience.
How well memory works, how accurate it is, how it is affected by various aspects of the criminal justice system — these are all important questions. But there are others as well: Can we tell when someone is reporting an accurate memory?
Alces draws on neuroscience to explore the internal contradictions of legal doctrines, and consider what would be involved in constructing novel legal regimes based on emerging understandings of human capacities and characteristics not only ...
Does neuroscience show that all our ideas about law and ethics are false? David Opderbeck answers this question with a broad and deep survey of the relationship between theology, science, and ethics.
Adopting a broadly compatibilist approach, this volume's authors argue that the behavioral and mind sciences do not threaten the moral foundations of legal responsibility.
Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C) by Emslie, H., Wilson, F. C., Burden, V., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Wilson, B.A. (2003). Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 539–542. doi:10.1080/09297040601112781. Barrett ...
This volume provides an interdisciplinary exploration of how freedom of thought might function as an ethical principle and as a constitutional or human right.