The implications for law of new neuroscientific techniques and findings are now among the hottest topics in legal, academic, and media venues. Law and Neuroscience - a collaboration of professors in law, neuroscience, and biology - is the first coursebook to chart this new territory, providing the world's most comprehensive collection of neurolaw materials. Features: Designed from the ground up with extensive e-capability in mind, with each e-chapter extensively linked to outside sources. Technical subjects explained in an accessible and user-friendly manner. Extensive glossary of key terms. Covers highly current material; over 60% of the cases and publications included were published since 2008
Roskies , Adina L. , “Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance, ” 1 Neuroethics 19 ( 2008 ). Rubinstein , Ariel , “Comment on Neuroeconomics, ” 24 Econ. & Phil . 485 ( 2008 ). Ryle , Gilbert , The Concept of ...
Although there was a substantial range of opinion among Project participants about the potential relevance of neuroscience to criminal law, it became apparent that a basic primer or handbook that set forth a statement of the relation as the ...
Bringing together the latest work from leading scholars in this emerging and vibrant subfield of law, this book examines the philosophical issues that inform the intersection between law and neuroscience.
This book studies the various interactions between neuroscience and the world of law, and explores how neuroscientific findings could affect some fundamental legal categories and how the law should be implemented in such cases.
How well memory works, how accurate it is, how it is affected by various aspects of the criminal justice system — these are all important questions. But there are others as well: Can we tell when someone is reporting an accurate memory?
Alces draws on neuroscience to explore the internal contradictions of legal doctrines, and consider what would be involved in constructing novel legal regimes based on emerging understandings of human capacities and characteristics not only ...
Does neuroscience show that all our ideas about law and ethics are false? David Opderbeck answers this question with a broad and deep survey of the relationship between theology, science, and ethics.
Adopting a broadly compatibilist approach, this volume's authors argue that the behavioral and mind sciences do not threaten the moral foundations of legal responsibility.
This volume provides an interdisciplinary exploration of how freedom of thought might function as an ethical principle and as a constitutional or human right.
Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C) by Emslie, H., Wilson, F. C., Burden, V., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Wilson, B.A. (2003). Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 539–542. doi:10.1080/09297040601112781. Barrett ...