Critics have maintained that John Rawls’s theory of justice is unrealistic and undemocratic. Andrius Gališanka’s incisive intellectual biography argues that in misunderstanding the origins and development of Rawls’s argument, previous narratives fail to explain the novelty of his philosophical approach and so misunderstand his political vision.
"Though the "Revised Edition of A Theory of Justice", published in 1999, is the definitive statement of Rawls's view, so much of the extensive literature on Rawls's theory refers to the first edition.
Previous edition, 1st, published in 1971.
This book introduces his central ideas and examines their contribution to contemporary political thought.
This is a short, accessible introduction to John Rawls' thought and gives a thorough and concise presentation of the main outlines of Rawls' theory as well as drawing links between Rawls' enterprise and other important positions in moral ...
This book continues and revises the ideas of justice as fairness that John Rawls presented in A Theory of Justice but changes its philosophical interpretation in a fundamental way.
Since the publication of A Theory of Justice in 1971, John Rawls has been viewed as one of the most important political theorists of the 20th century. In this book,...
This concise study guide includes plot summary; character analysis; author biography; study questions; historical context; suggestions for further reading; and much more.
... the strains-of-commitment argument, if it applies to moral and philosophical beliefs at all, is much less compelling than in the case of religious belief. What of Rawls's additional claim (TJ, sec. 33) that “the reasoning in this case ...
This book originated as lectures for a course on political philosophy that Rawls taught regularly at Harvard in the 1980s.
This book is divided into three parts corresponding to the three great books that form the core of John Rawls's theory: A Theory of Justice (1971), Political Liberalism (1993), and The Law of Peoples (1999).