In eighteenth- and nineteenth-century debates about the constructions of American nationhood and national citizenship, the frequently invoked concept of divided sovereignty signified the division of power between state and federal authorities and/or the possibility of one nation residing within the geopolitical boundaries of another. Political and social realities of the nineteenth century—such as immigration, slavery, westward expansion, Indigenous treaties, and financial panics—amplified anxieties about threats to national/state sovereignty. Rochelle Raineri Zuck argues that, in the decades between the ratification of the Constitution and the publication of Sutton Griggs’s novel Imperium in Imperio in 1899, four populations were most often referred to as racial and ethnic nations within the nation: the Cherokees, African Americans, Irish Americans, and Chinese immigrants. Writers and orators from these groups engaged the concept of divided sovereignty to assert alternative visions of sovereignty and collective allegiance (not just ethnic or racial identity), to gain political traction, and to complicate existing formations of nationhood and citizenship. Their stories intersected with issues that dominated nineteenth-century public argument and contributed to the Civil War. In five chapters focused on these groups, Zuck reveals how constructions of sovereignty shed light on a host of concerns including regional and sectional tensions; territorial expansion and jurisdiction; economic uncertainty; racial, ethnic, and religious differences; international relations; immigration; and arguments about personhood, citizenship, and nationhood.
... and therefore makes the difference as to whether we are willing to accept the outcome or mobilize to change it.63 For example, Karen J. Alter identifies a puzzle in the fact that international judges routinely rule against member ...
“Australia and East Timor: Fair Dinkum,” Economist, May 21, 2005, p. 70. 52. “Economy (Timor-Leste),” Europa World. 53. “Treaty Between Australia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor ...
This book accordingly argues for a global system of justice based on a domestic model of compulsory law.
In this highly accessible book, Robert Jackson provides a concise and comprehensive introduction to the history and meaning of sovereignty.
Jeremy Adelman and Stephen Aron, “From Borderlands to Borders: Empires, Nation States, and the People in Between in North American History,” American HistoricalReview 104 (June 1999): 816. 25. The best analysis ofthe polemics ofcolonial ...
Board of Trustees James A. Johnson Chairman Leonard Abramson Michael H. Armacost Ronald J. Arnault Elizabeth E. ... Dam D. Ronald Daniel Stephen Friedman Vartan Gregorian Bernadine P. Healy Samuel Hellman Warren Hellman Robert A. Helman ...
They are known today as spokesmen of opposite positions, Hobbes of absolutism, Harrington of republicanism. Yet behind their disagreements, argues Arihiro Fukuda, there lay a common perspective.
In vivid historical detail—with millions tortured and slaughtered in Europe, a king put on trial for his life, journalists groaning at idiotic complaints about the League of Nations, and much more—Don Herzog charts both the political ...
This book is the first of its kind to address a question of both practical and theoretical significance: how do political entities within a “divided nation” engage each other in terms of trade, investment, and other economic activities? ...
In this fascinating book written in 1884, Bliss balances the argumentative excesses of both advocates of states' rights and of federal supremacy.