In this volume, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Michael Kammen explores the U.S. Constitution's place in the public consciousness and its role as a symbol in American life, from ratification in 1788 to our own time. As he examines what the Constitution has meant to the American people (perceptions and misperceptions, uses and abuses, knowledge and ignorance), Kammen shows that although there are recurrent declarations of reverence most of us neither know nor fully understand our Constitution. How did this gap between ideal and reality come about? To explain it, Kammen examines the complex and contradictory feelings about the Constitution that emerged during its preparation and that have been with us ever since. He begins with our confusion as to the kind of Union we created, especially with regard to how much sovereignty the states actually surrendered to the central government. This confusion is the source of the constitutional crisis that led to the Civil War and its aftermath. Kammen also describes and analyzes changing perceptions of the differences and similarities between the British and American constitutions; turn-of-the-century debates about states' rights versus national authority; and disagreements about how easy or difficult it ought to be to amend the Constitution. Moving into the twentieth century, he notes the development of a "cult of the Constitution" following World War I, and the conflict over policy issues that persisted despite a shared commitment to the Constitution.
"Fascinating . . . a subtle and teeming narrative . . . masterly." —Time "This is a big, ambitious book, and Kammen pulls it off admirably. . . . [He] brings a prodigious mind and much scholarly rigor to his task . . . an importnat ...
DialoguesofJohn Adams and Benjamin Rush, 1805–1813 (San Marino, 1966), 112; Vernon L. Parrington, ed.: The Connecticut Wits (NewYork, 1926),xiii. 39Wood: Creation of theAmerican Republic, 517–18, 524, 562, 595.
Eugene Genovese offered the principal critique, followed by comments by David Potter, Kenneth Stampp, and Stanley Elkins. Potter called Genovese's paper arresting but suggested that Phillips's “Central Theme of Southern History” needed ...
This detailed study, by a Pulitzer-prize-winning historian, of their activities and of the gradual breakdown of communications between the colonies and the mother country, until the link between the two become only "a rope of sand," is, in ...
A historical overview of the concept of liberty in American culture and thought
Constitutional Pluralism: Conflicting Interpretations of the Founders' Intentions
A distinguished historian traces the changing world of American leisure, from the 1880s to the evolution of mass culture following World War II, and examines the impact of opinion polls...
See Alfred Kazin, Starting Out in the Thirties (Boston, 1965), 29–30. 69. GS, “Pictures and Landscapes,” NR 47 (June 2, 1926); 61; GS, “The Art Bogy,” SEP 201 (Jan. 12, 1929): 33, 129. 70. Ibid., 130. In 1927 Seldes was hired by Ivy Lee ...
In artworks from a mosaic by Marc Chagall to schoolchildren's paintings, in writings from Susan Fenimore Cooper to Annie Dillard, and in diverse print sources from family genealogical registers to...
We can profit from an observation made by Denis Donoghue : " We are likely to find that much American literature achieves its vitality by a conscientious labour to transform the mere state of failure into the artistic success of forms ...