A favorite classroom prep tool of successful students that is often recommended by professors, the Examples & Explanations (E&E) series provides an alternative perspective to help you understand your casebook and in-class lectures. Each E&E offers hypothetical questions complemented by detailed explanations that allow you to test your knowledge of the topics in your courses and compare your own analysis. Here’s why you need an E&E to help you study throughout the semester: Clear explanations of each class topic, in a conversational, funny style. Features hypotheticals similar to those presented in class, with corresponding analysis so you can use them during the semester to test your understanding, and again at exam time to help you review. It offers coverage that works with ALL the major casebooks, and suits any class on a given topic. The Examples & Explanations series has been ranked the most popular study aid among law students because it is equally as helpful from the first day of class through the final exam.
Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism features straightforward, informal text that is never simplistic.
Constitutional Law: Individual Rights, Third Edition, continues to offer complete coverage as part of a two-volume study-guide set. This book and its companion - National Power and Federalism - provide...
Such service automatically established personal jurisdiction under the rationale of Pennoyer, and such service is still good today according to the unanimous decision of Burnham. The Court today is somewhat divided over the reason for ...
Both this book and its companion volume,¿Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights, combine detailed textual material with real-world examples and explanations that apply the relevant constitutional doctrine to ...
Finally, there is a Criminal Law study aid that teachers can recommend to their students with complete confidence: Singer and LaFond's CRIMINAL LAW: Examples and Explanations . Carefully designed to...
Florida, 145 Gutierrez-Hermosillo, United States v., 169 Hadfield, United States v., 123 Hale, United States v., 63 Hale v. Fish, 55 Hall, State v., 208 Hall, United States v., 36 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 344 Hamdi v.
John E. Nowak, Ronald D. Rotunda. does not mean that the “ reasonable person ” standard is not met . The Second Element of the Miller Test . With respect to the second part of the Miller test , the Court offered " a few plain examples ...
Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998), suggested that a person in a protected area such as a home may nonetheless not have a reasonable expectation of privacy if there for purely commercial purposes, ... Anderson, 154 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir.
A favorite among successful students, and often recommended by professors, the unique Examples & Explanations series gives you extremely clear introductions to concepts followed by realistic examples that mirror those presented in the ...
NATIONAL POWER AND FEDERALISM is part of a two-volume set that includes a corresponding treatment of Individual Rights. Now your students can get the specific extra guidance they need, when...