Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism, Ninth edition, by Christopher N. May, Allan Ides, and Simona Grossi, provides a clearly written, comprehensive examination of constitutional doctrine pertaining to national power and federalism. This problem-oriented study guide provides students and teachers with a highly readable and accessible study of constitutional law. Both this book and its companion volume,¿Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights, combine detailed textual material with real-world examples and explanations that apply the relevant constitutional doctrine to specific fact patterns. The text operates as a readable and citable treatise on the topics covered, and the examples and explanations serve as an elaboration on that text. Its unique, time-tested Examples & Explanations pedagogy combines textual material with well-written, comprehensive and up-to-date examples, explanations and questions. A favorite among law school students, and often recommended by professors, this guide takes students through the principal doctrines of constitutional law covered in a typical course. New to the Ninth Edition: Inclusion of more than 40 new Supreme Court cases New and updated Examples & Explanations More sophisticated discussion of the federal preemption doctrine Updated treatment of presidential impeachment Expanded discussion of the executive privilege doctrine Deeper coverage of the appointment and removal of federal officials Professors and students will benefit from: Hypotheticals similar to those presented in class, with structure and reasoning behind the corresponding analysis An alternative perspective to help you understand your casebook and in-class lectures Straightforward, informal text that is never simplistic, and quickly gets to the point in conversational style laced with humor Adaptability with all major Constitutional Law casebooks Authors with over 70 years of combined experience teaching Constitutional Law
The Court's more recent statement in Pike, however, suggests that it may now be possible to challenge a law under the dormant Commerce Clause by showing that the state could have achieved its purposes equally well through alternative ...
Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism features straightforward, informal text that is never simplistic.
Where the speech in question is of a type that the Court treats as having relatively low value, the requirement that there be alternative channels of communication may be so diluted as to be meaningless. For example, in City of Renton v ...
Constitutional Law: Individual Rights, Third Edition, continues to offer complete coverage as part of a two-volume study-guide set. This book and its companion - National Power and Federalism - provide...
A favorite among successful students, and often recommended by professors, the unique Examples & Explanations series gives you extremely clear introductions to concepts followed by realistic examples that mirror those presented in the ...
NATIONAL POWER AND FEDERALISM is part of a two-volume set that includes a corresponding treatment of Individual Rights. Now your students can get the specific extra guidance they need, when...
Such service automatically established personal jurisdiction under the rationale of Pennoyer, and such service is still good today according to the unanimous decision of Burnham. The Court today is somewhat divided over the reason for ...
Finally, there is a Criminal Law study aid that teachers can recommend to their students with complete confidence: Singer and LaFond's CRIMINAL LAW: Examples and Explanations . Carefully designed to...
John E. Nowak, Ronald D. Rotunda. does not mean that the “ reasonable person ” standard is not met . The Second Element of the Miller Test . With respect to the second part of the Miller test , the Court offered " a few plain examples ...
Florida, 145 Gutierrez-Hermosillo, United States v., 169 Hadfield, United States v., 123 Hale, United States v., 63 Hale v. Fish, 55 Hall, State v., 208 Hall, United States v., 36 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 344 Hamdi v.