From natural disaster areas to zones of conflict around the world, a new logic of intervention has emerged. This new post-Cold War international order combines military action and humanitarian aid, conflates moral imperatives and political arguments, and confuses the concepts of legitimacy and legality. The mandate to protect human lives, however and wherever endangered, has thus promoted a new form of military and humanitarian government that operates in a temporality of urgency, moving from one crisis to the next, applying the same battery of technical expertise -- from army logistics to epidemiological management to the latest administrative tools for forging "good governance." In the name of the right to intervene, this new strategy challenges national sovereignties and deploys economic powers. Not only does it take charge of people's lives, it also reduces their histories and expectations to bare lives to be rescued.
Drawing on the critical insights of anthropologists, legal scholars, political scientists, and practitioners from the field, Contemporary States of Emergency first examines the historical antecedents as well as the moral, juridical, ideological, and economic conditions that have made military and humanitarian interventions possible today. It then addresses the practical process of intervention in global situations on five continents, illustrating the diversity as well as the parallels between contemporary forms of military and humanitarian interventions.
Finally, it investigates the ethical and political consequences of the generalization of states of emergency and the humanitarian government that they entail. The authors thus seek to understand a critical question that confronts the world today: How and why have military and humanitarian interventions transformed the international order such that what was once a logic of exception has now become the rule of contemporary global politics?
Anderson , F. W. “ Why Did Colonial New Englanders Make Bad Soldiers ? Contractual Principles and Military Conduct during the ... Andre , Louis , Michel le Tellier et l'Organization de l'Armee Monarchique . Paris : Felix Alcan , 1906 .
Holt, F.M., The Mahdist State in the Sudan, Oxford University Press, 1958. Holt, P.M., The Sudan of the Three Niles: The Funj Chronicle, Brill, London, 1999. Holt, P.M., and Daly M.W., A History of the Sudan, Pearson Education Ltd, ...
While the KM literature takes licence with Polanyi, it also seems to ignore Nonaka and Takeuchi's rejection ofthe idea that knowledge can be managed as opposed to created (see also Von Krogh et al. 2000).5 Von Krogh et al.
Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Robert S. Litwak and Samuel F. Wells ( Cambridge : Ballinger , 1988 ) , pp . 67-71 , 74 . 14 Walt , Origins of Alliances , pp . 225-27 , and the studies cited there . 15 Ibid . , pp .
For example , the earliest classical philosophers , beginning with Plato , studied the role of culture in the governing process . While Plato did not have a conception of nationalism , or of a dynamic polity — including mobility and ...
... in the inspired Japanese press in support of extremist policies , the unconciliatory and bellicose public utterances of Japanese leaders , and the tactics of covert or overt threat which had 150 AMERICAN FRONTIER ACTIVITIES IN ASIA.
... covert , or semiformal — that were extended to the DPRK by Western governments in the kangsong taeguk period , we might well discover that the ratio of such outside assistance to local commercial earnings began to approach the scale ...
1155-57; and see J. Garry Clifford, "President Truman and Peter the Great's Will," Diplomatic History (Fall 1980): pp. 371-86, especially p. 381n38. 33. Polls cited in Walsh, "What the American People Think of Russia," pp.
This is the latest edition of a major work on the history of American foreign policy. The volume reflects the revisionism prevalent in the field but offers balanced accounts.