The problem of responsibility in moral philosophy has been lively debated in the last decades, especially since the publication of Harry Frankfurt's seminal paper, "Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility" (1969). Compatibilists - also known as "soft" determinists - and, on the other side, incompatibilists - libertarians and "hard" determinists - are the main contenders in this major academic controversy. The debate goes back to Antiquity. After Aristotle, compatibilists, and especially the Stoics, debated this issue with the incompatibilists, notably Epicurus (though his classification as an incompatibilist has been disputed in modern scholarship), Alexander of Aphrodisias and Plutarch. The problem debated at that time and the problem debated nowadays are fundamentally the same, even though the terms and the concepts evolved over the centuries. In Antiquity, the central notion was that of "what is up to us", or "what depends on us". The present volume brings together twenty contributions devoted to examining the problem of moral responsibility as it arises in Antiquity in direct connection with the concept of what is up to us - to eph' hêmin, in Greek, or in nostra potestate and in nobis, in its Latin counterparts, aiming to promote classical scholarship, and to shed some light on the contemporary issues as well.
In addition to these six master texts, there is also:a biography of Marcus Aurelius. For students of Stoicism, there is the convenience of having all six texts in one searchable volume.
"This book is a fresh examination of Aristotle's teaching on the relation between reason and moral virtue in the Nicomachean Ethics, taking as its point of departure the oft-noted, but still perhaps not sufficiently appreciated fact, that ...
"This text remains the only English translation of Bonhöffer's classic, definitive examination of Epictetus' ethics.
In this case there is no reason to suppose the action displays the symptoms of or is a modal pleasure. Indeed, strictly speaking, the person who engages in this activity, however skillfully, only for subordinate reasons, ...
This book reconstructs in detail the older Stoic theory of the psychology of action, discussing it in relation to Aristotelian, Epicurean, Platonic, and some of the more influential modern theories.
This work is presented here with a literary-oriented introduction, the Greek text has been checked carefully, the German translation aims to be readable and is supplemented by detailed notes.
... idea , conflict is inevitable . Only when action is free from idea does conflict cease . ' But how can action ever be free from idea ? Surely there can be no action without there being ideation first . Action follows idea , and I cannot ...
Dieser Band sieht hier seine Aufgabe. Er ist das Ergebnis einer internationalen Tagung an der Universität Münster. Zahlreiche Experten stellen die Ethik des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus in systematischer Abfolge dar. Die Them.